1. Why Use Angular, React, or Next.js?

Each of these technologies excels in different environments, team cultures, and project goals. Understanding where and why to use Angular, React, or Next.js is crucial for making informed decisions that align with your application’s scale, maintainability, and performance needs.

While modern frameworks like Angular, React, and Next.js power a large portion of today’s web applications, it’s important to remember the broader web ecosystem. According to recent web surveys, around 90% of websites still rely on jQuery or vanilla JavaScript for core functionality. Many legacy sites and small projects continue to use WordPress or other CMS platforms without heavy frontend frameworks, proving that the web is a diverse landscape with many solutions coexisting.

This means that:

• If you’re building large-scale, enterprise-grade applications with complex state management, type safety, and architectural rigor, Angular is a solid choice.
• For flexible, component-driven UI development with a huge ecosystem and freedom to choose your own tools, React stands out.
• When your focus is on server-side rendering, SEO, and hybrid static/dynamic content delivery, Next.js offers an optimized, full-featured experience.

Your choice depends on your project’s requirements, team expertise, and long-term maintainability goals.

Angular - The Enterprise Framework

Angular is a batteries-included framework developed by Google. It provides a complete solution: routing, HTTP services, form modules, dependency injection, RxJS-based state management, and strict architecture guidelines.

✅ Best suited for:

• Large-scale enterprise apps
• Government or regulated industry software
• Teams with Java/.NET background
• Organizations that value consistency and convention

Why Angular?

• Structured and opinionated, ideal for large teams
• Powerful CLI and built-in testing utilities
• TypeScript-first with strict type safety
• Excellent long-term maintainability

🚀 Real-world

This is the best desicion on enterprise level to develop a secure and high-performance trading interface tailored for users. Angular’s opinionated structure and built-in TypeScript support provided the architectural consistency needed for complex financial workflows.

---

React - The Flexible UI Library

React is a lightweight UI library developed by Meta. It offers component-based architecture but leaves most architectural decisions (routing, state management, etc.) to the developer.

✅ Best suited for:

• Startups and fast-paced projects
• Design-first UIs and custom component libraries
• Developers comfortable assembling tools

Why React?

• Minimal and flexible
• Huge ecosystem of libraries and integrations
• Encourages experimentation and rapid prototyping
• Easy to adopt in existing codebases

🛠 Real-world

I made a animation design tool using Rive.js, prototyped with React. You can try the prototype at rive-demo.vercel.app. React's flexibility made it perfect for experimenting with complex UI logic and canvas-based rendering.

---

Next.js - The React Framework That Does It All

Next.js, developed by Vercel, brings full-stack capabilities to React. It supports SSR, SSG, ISR, API routes, and edge functions all out of the box.

✅ Best suited for:

• Content-driven, SEO-critical websites
• Hybrid static + dynamic web apps
• Teams building full-stack React projects

Why Next.js?

• Excellent performance defaults
• Optimized SSR, SSG, ISR for scalability
• File-based routing and API layers
• Strong developer experience

🌐 Real-world

At a previous company, we built a Sitebuilder platform that allowed content teams to visually edit and manage gaming websites. The platform was designed to Games & UI updates and content directly to production-ready Next.js applications like oyunlar1.com. Next.js was chosen for its strong SEO performance, incremental static regeneration (ISR), and multilingual routing, making it ideal for large-scale, content-heavy platforms.

---

🧠 Let's focus Pros & Cons

2. Performance and Ecosystem Differences

Performance isn’t just about speed it’s also about developer productivity, tooling consistency, and how well a framework scales with complexity. Here’s how Angular, React, and Next.js differ in terms of performance philosophy, tooling, and package ecosystems.

Angular - CLI-Driven Performance and Integrated Tooling

Angular provides a monolithic CLI that includes everything out-of-the-box: routing, testing, internationalization, environment configs, AOT compilation, and aggressive production optimizations like tree-shaking and differential loading.

Key Advantages:

• Angular CLI handles linting, testing, i18n, and production builds without extra configuration.
• AOT (Ahead-of-Time) Compilation improves load performance by precompiling templates.
• RxJS and Signals enable reactive programming with minimal runtime overhead.
• Strong support for enterprise-grade libraries such as:
  • NgRx for Redux-style state management with DevTools and Effects support
  • Angular CDK and Material for standardized, accessible UI components
  • NGXS, Akita, or SignalStore as alternatives depending on project scale and dev preference
• Official integration paths for i18n, SSR via Angular Universal, and builder API extensions

Trade-offs:

• Performance optimization options are more rigid and deeply tied to Angular’s internal structure.
• The framework’s size and complexity can introduce overhead for small/medium apps.
• Requires deeper learning curve, especially with advanced patterns like NgRx Effects or DI tokens.

---

React - Choose-Your-Own-Adventure Performance

React is intentionally minimal, giving you freedom but also requiring responsibility. You must select your own tools for routing, state management, form validation, and build setup unless you use something like Create React App (CRA) or Vite.

Key Advantages:

• Highly customizable performance stack (e.g., Vite, SWC, esbuild, or Webpack).
• Flexibility to choose lightweight, modern packages like Zustand, TanStack Query, or React Hook Form.
• Concurrent Rendering (React 18) enables fine-grained control over UI responsiveness.
• Backed by an ecosystem of modern toolmakers, including:
  • TanStack (Query, Table, Router): Advanced, framework-agnostic solutions for data fetching and UI logic
  • Vercel: Maintainers of Next.js and many ecosystem tools such as SWR, Turbopack, and open-source UI components
  • Remix, React Aria, and others enriching the ecosystem with accessibility and routing innovations

Trade-offs:

• No standard CLI or opinionated tooling each project’s setup can vary wildly.
• Performance depends heavily on library choices, which may result in technical debt or inconsistencies.
• Teams must make and maintain more decisions on architecture, libraries, and conventions.

📌 Note:

I maintain a custom React boilerplate at yagiz-aydin/boilerplate-cra, which began with Create React App and was later ejected to allow deep customization of Webpack and Babel configurations. This setup provides full control over the build pipeline ideal for experimenting with advanced performance optimizations and fine-tuning bundling strategies for real-world projects.

---

Next.js - Optimized by Default, But Not Without Challenges

Next.js abstracts away many performance and architectural decisions by offering powerful defaults; hybrid rendering (SSG/SSR/ISR), image optimization, script loading strategies, and edge rendering support via middleware and Vercel’s platform.

Key Advantages:

• Zero-config performance: fast builds, automatic static optimization, and smart code splitting.
• Image and font optimization out of the box.
• ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration) bridges the gap between dynamic and static content.
• Strong community support and growing hype, backed by Vercel and frequent updates.
• Introduction of App Router (new) alongside the traditional Page Router gives developers more flexibility with nested routing, layouts, and server components.

Trade-offs:

• You may still need to tune Webpack or opt into experimental features for very large applications.
• Edge functions and middleware are powerful but can have a steep learning curve, especially for developers new to serverless or edge computing.
• The fast pace of Next.js releases and feature changes can feel overwhelming, making it challenging to keep up, especially for developers who want to diversify their skills beyond the React and JavaScript ecosystem (e.g., exploring .NET, Java, or Node.js backend tools).
• The new App Router introduces advanced concepts like React Server Components that require an adjustment period compared to the older Page Router.

🧠 Pros & Cons

---

📌 Note:

Next.js has been the React poster child for years. Server-Side Rendering (SSR), Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR), App Router, Edge Functions — it’s a buzzword bonanza, and many developers have eagerly adopted it like an all-you-can-eat buffet. But as the framework grows, some question whether the hype is blinding us to increasing complexity and bloat.

If you want a deeper dive into this perspective, check out this thought-provoking article:
“Next.js is dead? Is it time to break up for good?” by Yash Sharma.

It’s worth reflecting on whether Next.js is evolving into an overcomplicated beast or still the best fit for modern web development.